Gayton v Rinholm, 2016 ABCA 328

image added // republished // image added [1]               The parties were invited to apply for advice and directions regarding an appeal. On July 22, 2016, Hall J dismissed Ms Gayton’s application for the appointment of publicly funded legal counsel and a publicly funded litigation representative. Ms Gayton filed a Notice of... Continue Reading →


Say, are we being Fried?

"However, independent studies consistently report serious health effects, ranging from DNA damage, a 300% reduction in sperm counts, 290% more brain tumors, autism and birth defects."

The Pill that Steals

“The purpose of an independent investigation is to discover what led to an adverse event and to audit the standard of care provided to the individual. An independent investigation may not identify root causes or find aspects of the provision of healthcare that directly caused an incident but it will often find things that could have been done better."

BRIEF – CETA: TTIP’s ugly brother

Source CETA: TTIP's ugly brother August 2016 This is a guide to the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada. Millions have signed a petition calling on the EU to stop negotiations on TTIP (the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership) and CETA. While there is growing public awareness about the... Continue Reading →

When is enough, well, enough?

I write today about RANJIT KUMAR CHANDRA, a disgraceful creature who masquerades as both a doctor and a researcher.   So, here's my question, why isn't this "doctor" stripped of his license and held liable to every researcher and patient who relied on his fraud? Republished article follows - Source - Last month, Ranjit Kumar... Continue Reading →

Dear Attorneys General

"Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability."


"Finally, the plaintiff, ACCESS TO JUSTICE claims and respectfully submits, THE RULES, discriminate against self represented litigants, hereinafter referred to as SRLs and litigants with limited financial resources by failing to require advanced written arguments on all grounds a represented party intends to argue in all instances, in advance, and with ample opportunity for them to access any available supports."

Attention: Educators – A Class Divided

A Class Divided Link to video 1985 , Home   » Psychology  -  53 min 91 Comments Elliott divided her class by eye color -- those with blue eyes and those with brown. On the first day, the blue-eyed children were told they were smarter, nicer, neater, and better than those with brown eyes. Throughout the day,... Continue Reading →

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: